Pretoria leans harder onto China in wake of G20

by | Nov 28, 2025

Join our Email List, admin comment WhatsApp Group and Telegram Channel.

This is part of a long ongoing process of absorption into China’s sphere of influence, accelerated by Trump’s criticisms. But it comes at a cost.

At the G20 summit in Johannesburg last weekend, China and South Africa announced a new cooperation initiative intended to accelerate Africa’s modernisation. The plan extends the ten partnership actions pledged at the 2024 Forum on China-Africa Cooperation in Beijing and was drafted jointly with African governments. Its stated purpose is to attract wider international investment and attention to the continent.

Zhao Wenfei, minister counsellor at the Chinese embassy in South Africa, described the initiative as tailored to Africa’s particular conditions and directed towards modernisation, shared prosperity, social and cultural progress, environmental harmony, and peaceful development. He added that modernisation need not follow a single model and that China’s own experience demonstrates that developing countries can reach prosperity without copying Western paths.

A prominent element is the emphasis on green infrastructure and green mining. Lin Feng, director-general for international trade and economic affairs at China’s Ministry of Commerce, said low-carbon approaches in the mineral sector would support higher-quality growth and create opportunities for all participants. The initiative identifies seven priority areas for international cooperation in order to distribute the gains from sustainable mining, though the contents of those areas have not yet been published.

The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development has endorsed the project. Secretary-General Rebeca Grynspan noted that Chinese investment and technology have already delivered a good deal of the rural off-grid solar power in South Africa. No timetable or financing details have been released, but this is a fairly firm rebuke of America’s influence here.

 

Balance

But much like America (or any other Great Power), Chinese behaviour can be fairly one-sided. South Africa’s merchandise trade with China has consistently dwarfed that with the United States over the past half-decade. In 2024 bilateral trade with China approached $45 billion, comprising imports of $21.8 billion (mainly machinery, electronics and consumer goods) and exports of roughly $23 billion, dominated by ores, metals and agricultural products, yielding a persistent deficit that widened to $9.4 billion from $6.7 billion in 2019. China’s share of South Africa’s total trade has risen from about 15 per cent in 2020 to nearer 20 per cent in 2025, reflecting both post-pandemic supply-chain shifts and growing African mineral demand in China.

By contrast, total goods and services trade with the United States amounted to only $26.2 billion in 2024, marginally down from the previous year, with South Africa enjoying a surplus driven by vehicles, citrus and ferro-alloys exported under the African Growth and Opportunity Act, which accounted for more than one-fifth of bilateral exports. American trade has remained essentially flat since 2022, constrained by the impending expiry of AGOA preferences which have been dangling over the country – aside from the tensions with the Trump administration, South Africa graduated out of the requirements of the programme in several respects some years ago, and our eventual exclusion was inevitable. in September 2025 and sporadic political frictions.

But we run a trade surplus with the West, and a trade deficit with China. not only that, but China tends to get a lot of strangely juicy deals here.

In several places around the country since 2013, SAPS has dedicated special police units trained in Mandarin to prioritise the security of Chinese citizens in their settlements and neighbourhoods. The Chinese government has also been inspecting our military installations every few years for decades. Plus there is that massive Special Economic Zone in Limpopo, with infrastructure and utilities paid for by the South African taxpayer.

Chinese businesses tend to be fraudulent and criminal on the whole. Earlier this year, Temu and Shein were found to have, at enormous cost and effort, rekitted their entire supply chain to circumvent customs laws by micropackaging all their shipments. Then there’s the overall trade misinvoicing problem. Chinese firms systematically under-invoice exports to South Africa by 30–60%, evading duties and VAT. This caused ~R80–120 billion in lost revenue in the past six fiscal years, flooded markets with cheap steel and textiles, and crippled local manufacturers while funding capital flight back to China.

Our once-mighty steel and anthracite industries have virtually collapsed in little more than a decade, though mostly due to poor governance of the economy from Pretoria. ArcelorMittal South Africa, heir to the old Iscor, has shuttered or idled Newcastle, Saldanha, and large parts of Vanderbijlpark and Vereeniging, victims of endless load-shedding, and a broken Transnet rail system. At the same time, the country’s world-leading export-grade anthracite mines in KwaZulu-Natal closed almost overnight when rail lines to Richards Bay failed and Chinese buyers turned to Russia.

But onto this weak foundation, the flood of cheap Chinese steel has been like a ton of bricks. And now enters Chinese capital. Between 2023 and 2025, Chinese-backed consortia announced or began building entirely new steel mills: a giant Tosyali plant in Richards Bay funded mostly from China, a planned 2–3 million-ton works tied to Seriti Resources and its Chinese shareholders, and a clutch of smaller stainless and special-steel mini-mills quietly registered across Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal. Where South African furnaces went cold, Chinese ones are rising, often on the same industrial graveyards, turning the country from Africa’s steel champion into a net importer largely supplied, and increasingly owned, by China.

In the context of all this disingenuous, selfish and one-sided economic behaviour, China’s cumulative stock in South Africa seems a little more alarming. It reached $13.2 billion by the end of 2024, though greenfield commitments have fallen sharply to $650 million in the period 2020–July 2025 from $3 billion in the preceding five years. American flows turned negative continent-wide in 2024, reflecting repatriation and caution over regulatory uncertainty.

 

Structure

Beyond commerce, several large-scale frameworks underpin the relationship. The Forum on China-Africa Cooperation Beijing Action Plan for 2025–2027 commits China to ten partnership programmes spanning industrialisation, agricultural modernisation, health, security and people-to-people exchanges, with South Africa positioned as a primary beneficiary.

The Belt and Road Initiative continues to finance transport and energy projects, while the New Development Bank, headquartered in Shanghai but with South Africa as a founding member, has approved loans exceeding $5 billion for renewable and infrastructure schemes across the BRICS economies.

Financial integration has advanced through a renewed bilateral currency swap line of 30–60 billion yuan, the longstanding renminbi clearing centre in Johannesburg, and, since November 2025, Standard Bank’s direct participation in China’s Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), the first such access granted to an African institution. BRICS discussions on alternative settlement mechanisms have accelerated, though they remain largely exploratory.

On 20 November 2025, Standard Bank, Africa’s largest lender by assets, became the first bank on the continent to activate direct access to CIPS. The service, licensed to Standard Bank in June, was formally inaugurated at the South African Reserve Bank in the presence of Lesetja Kganyago, governor of the SARB; Pan Gongsheng, governor of the People’s Bank of China; and Wang Hongbo, chairman of CIPS.

CIPS permits financial institutions to clear and settle renminbi-denominated payments directly with Chinese counterparties, bypassing the currency conversions and correspondent banking chains that have traditionally inflated costs and lengthened settlement times for Africa-China transactions. With China now accounting for a larger share of African imports than any other source (34 per cent of surveyed businesses in Standard Bank’s 2024 Trade Barometer, up from 23 per cent the previous year) the removal of these frictions carries material economic weight.

The two central-bank governors described the arrangement as a milestone for commercial payments between the continents. The practical consequence is that African importers and Chinese exporters can now transact in renminbi with the same speed and cost as domestic transfers. Pretty much all forms of business for Chinese and African operators are streamlined by this system.

And this comes at a time when Western-led payment systems face growing political constraints. The US has used dollar inflation as a means of taxing forex holders, a sort of imperial tribute system which ensures that they can implement monetary policies which would be suicidally reckless for any other financial power, but which comes at the cost of dollar holders. A lot of countries are starting to get a bit tired of this.

The dollar still accounts for about 89% of global currency trading and 49% of African cross-border payments, but initiatives like CIPS encourage non-dollar settlements for specific trade corridors. For instance, Africa-China trade hit $134 billion in the first five months of 2025, with 34% of surveyed African businesses importing from China (up from 23% in 2023), and RMB now covers roughly 10% of these settlements—rising from under 1% a decade ago. This “functional de-dollarization” creates parallel liquidity circuits less exposed to US monetary policy swings or dollar shortages, hedging against issues like exchange controls and volatility. Over time, as more African banks follow Standard Bank’s lead, it could accelerate network effects for CIPS, which processed $19.4 billion daily in 2019 and now links 1,530 institutions globally. However, CIPS still relies on SWIFT for most messaging and is dwarfed by US systems like CHIPS (40 times the transaction volume), so it poses no immediate existential threat to the dollar.

As a smaller but fairly important footnote to all of this, the Chinese-South African joint venture at Stellenbosch University established the world’s longest intercontinental quantum-secure communication link in March this year, spanning 12,900 kilometres via the Jinan-1 microsatellite, enabling unhackable key distribution between Beijing and a ground station near Durban. This is fairly essential to backdoor diplomacy and military cooperation, and military and security cooperation has indeed been expanding. Embedded in the FOCAC plan, it includes joint training, law-enforcement programmes and occasional trilateral naval exercises with Russia.

In all this context, the Initiative for Supporting Africa’s Modernisation launched at the G20 this past week, is more or less just adding wrapping paper to the Christmas present at this point.

 

Harmony

Taken together, these arrangements represent a deliberate, multi-domain deepening of ties that has proceeded largely undisturbed by Western sanctions regimes or competing initiatives.

But at the same time, we are seeing the rapid entrance of American mega firms, most of which are known to operate on loss-leading strategies to dominate and monopolise markets, like Wallmart and Amazon. We are also seeing the return of an old style of cronyism centred around Rothschild Capital’s vehicle B4SA, which is handling the lions share of the national infrastructure investment schemes.

Europe has managed to choke off our energy supply by funding green activists, and gotten massive “green hydrogen” deals in exchange, as well as big and profitable “green” loans.

South Africa certainly seems to be open for business, but in a strangely one-sided way, where we are allowed some infrastructure, but no industry. We are allowed tourism revenue, construction, and finance, but nothing tangible, nothing domestic, and all the ingredients necessary for a functioning local economy are being replaced or bought out by foreign powers.

From backwoodsmen carrying water and hewing timber, we became an autarchic powerhouse. We became democratic, redistributed a little wealth, but in no lasting way, while letting the geese that laid the golden eggs be sold for pennies or chopped for Sunday roasts.

And so we return to hewing wood and carrying water, but for someone new whom we call friend.

Interested in joining the movement? Find ways to get involved

Want to grow your brand? Advertise with The Cape Independent

The Cape Independent publishes stories about politics and current affairs, with a focus on the Western Cape. We generally write for a more conservative audience – the silent majority with good old common sense.
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Read the good stuff…